Mr. Cappadocia

You may regret this.
Face*Book: patrick.cappadocia
Skype: mr.cappadocia
Twitter: @MrCappadocia

RARE CANCER SEEN IN 41 HOMOSEXUALS

fuehrerbefehl:

uncivilwar13:

fuehrerbefehl:

deutschlandsgloria:

mr-cappadocia:

Doctors in New York and California have diagnosed among homosexual men 41 cases of a rare and often rapidly fatal form of cancer. Eight of the victims died less than 24 months after the diagnosis was made.

The cause of the outbreak is unknown, and there is as yet no evidence…

Ah, Mother Nature’s brilliant way to deal with abominations.

Nothing beats the good old Anally Injected Death Sentence

What is it exactly? Is it cancer or aids? What kind of cancer is it?

It’s about cancer, but still AIDS is still the king. Hell, most diseases or cancers homosexual man get are anally injected.

This is about AIDS. Back then they THOUGHT it was a form of cancer. AIDS infections often present in the form of Kaposi’s sarcoma, an extremely rare form of cancer that forms purplish lesions on the skin, gums, and so forth.

They had no clue what the fuck was going on. Because they were like “Why are all these gay men walking in with these fucking cancer lesions? And why so many in New York and San Francisco?”

Anonymous said: right, you're so smart but you don't recognize that hobby lobby has al;ready begun a precedent amongst other corporations to discriminate against hiring lgbtq workers ...

I know what you’re referring to. Obama is looking to sign an executive order (or perhaps already has?) that guarantees workplace protections for various members of the lgbqt community if they are employed by a Federal Contractor.

The argument being that some employers do not approve of homosexual relationships and thus should not be forced to employ them.

Except here’s where what’s good for the goose is good for the motherfucking gander.

Because no corporation in America is owed a contract by the Federal Government.

If the company in question refuses to abide by the rules mandated for Federal contractors then they are welcome to cease being Federal contractors.

If someone is willing to give up on millions, if not billions, in Federal money just so they don’t have to treat Steve and Gary like human beings then fuck ‘em because they’ll treat gay employees like shit no matter what you do.

In the mean time it’s pretty clear cut. I have little problem with the Obama Administration making this change. I mean he’s the fucking Executive Branch, this is his function. Anyone and everyone that disagrees mightily is welcome to vote something other than Democrat next election.

RARE CANCER SEEN IN 41 HOMOSEXUALS

excusemyhubris:

mr-cappadocia:

Doctors in New York and California have diagnosed among homosexual men 41 cases of a rare and often rapidly fatal form of cancer. Eight of the victims died less than 24 months after the diagnosis was made.

The cause of the outbreak is unknown, and there is as yet no evidence of contagion. But the…

Is this recent? Feels like an article from the 80s.

That’s because it is. It was one of the first major news articles about HIV/AIDS(thought they didn’t know it at the time), it’s from (I believe) 1981.

When I was a kid HIV was akin to the god damn plague. It was the polio of my era.

I came across this news article earlier and (at least to me) it reads like a fucking Stephen King novel…

A mysterious and undetectable disease that’s moving through the population killing off a specific group of people and nobody has the slightest fucking clue what’s going on.

I mean for fucks sake they were trying to cure AIDS with CHEMOTHERAPY, that’s how little they knew about what was going on.

Mind you I’m not sneering at these people, they had no way of knowing any better and it must’ve been so frightening.

I mean hell, *everyone* I knew with HIV is dead now. All of them. Christ.

RARE CANCER SEEN IN 41 HOMOSEXUALS

Doctors in New York and California have diagnosed among homosexual men 41 cases of a rare and often rapidly fatal form of cancer. Eight of the victims died less than 24 months after the diagnosis was made.

The cause of the outbreak is unknown, and there is as yet no evidence of contagion. But the doctors who have made the diagnoses, mostly in New York City and the San Francisco Bay area, are alerting other physicians who treat large numbers of homosexual men to the problem in an effort to help identify more cases and to reduce the delay in offering chemotherapy treatment.

The sudden appearance of the cancer, called Kaposi’s Sarcoma, has prompted a medical investigation that experts say could have as much scientific as public health importance because of what it may teach about determining the causes of more common types of cancer. First Appears in Spots

Doctors have been taught in the past that the cancer usually appeared first in spots on the legs and that the disease took a slow course of up to 10 years. But these recent cases have shown that it appears in one or more violet-colored spots anywhere on the body. The spots generally do not itch or cause other symptoms, often can be mistaken for bruises, sometimes appear as lumps and can turn brown after a period of time. The cancer often causes swollen lymph glands, and then kills by spreading throughout the body.

Doctors investigating the outbreak believe that many cases have gone undetected because of the rarity of the condition and the difficulty even dermatologists may have in diagnosing it.

In a letter alerting other physicians to the problem, Dr. Alvin E. Friedman-Kien of New York University Medical Center, one of the investigators, described the appearance of the outbreak as ”rather devastating.”

More Furry Selfies. =)

Anonymous said: What's your view on demisexuality

The going definition of demisexuality, for those not in the know, is that the person in question doesn’t feel sexual attraction (at all) unless there is a strong emotional bond.

Which sure, I suppose it’s a real thing… but it indicates to me that we’re reaching the point where every form of sexuality must be codified to some degree.

I mean I get heterosexual, bisexual, homosexual and even asexual. I understand why such things get discussed at length. 

But demisexual… maybe from a purely academic standpoint but for the laymen? Eh, I dunno.

I mean I, for example, could be considered (if my translation is right and it’s not)

Aplagiosexual. Which means that I experience sexual attraction, except towards people that kidnap children. Which is entirely true. I don’t find child abductors terribly attractive sexually.

But I’m not going to go around calling myself Aplagiosexual.

To put it bluntly it seems like the kind of thing where I see:

and you see blessed sunlight magenta’s rosie heavenscape.

As in affording a name to every single characteristic you have as a means of standing out from the crowd, seeming special and different.

Which in and of itself is nothing new, virtually everyone tries to stand out at some point. In fact accomplishments are an excellent way to do just that.

But standing out for attributes you were born with just doesn’t do it for me if we’re talking personally.

I mean I’m a really smart guy, crazy smart. It’s not something I’m proud of. I acknowledge it and I like that I am… but I can’t say I’m proud of it. I didn’t fucking do anything more than fall out of some woman’s vagina and bring a gallon of blood and guts and screaming with me.

So… that’s what I think of demisexuality.

Anonymous said: What do you think of the Gaza crisis? Is either side justified?

iamsineater:

mr-cappadocia:

iamsineater:

To be fair, Palestine was not a nation prior to 1988.

Palestine was a regional name for a stretch of land occupied by various tribes of Arabs and Jews. It was historically sparsely settled until WWII, when Jews flocked there under UN agreement and formed the UN recognized state of Israel.  

http://www.cjpmo.org/DisplayDocument.aspx?DocumentID=18

This document is actually anti-Semitic in nature, but it does break down the sparsity of the population in Palestine prior to WWII.

In the US small cities have more population than the entire region of Palestine had.  And entire sections of those small cities are overrun by illegal immigrants.  And we don’t lob rockets indiscriminately at Mexico and Guatemala and Cuba.  

And Israel started out as a much smaller state.  But actions by Jordan and Syria and Egypt that caused the Six Day War caused Israel to move to expand her borders because of the need for a buffer zone between the country borders and the existing cities and larger population areas in Israel.  

The problem is not simply Israel versus Palestine.  The problem in reality is Israel versus the entire Arab region.  There are “residents” of Palestine that were residents of Egypt or Saudi Arabia or Jordan or Syria a month or two ago and are now considered to be some kind of victim of Israeli oppression.  There has been and continues to be a massive influx of non-Palestinian natives into Palestine because of anti-Semitism and because of Shari’a law that states that death in battle with non-believers is awarded with everlasting paradise.  The rockets and other materials are brought in from underground tunnels by Egyptian and Syrian and Jordanian smugglers.  

I think from an ethical viewpoint the Israeli are more live and let live where the Palestinians and Egyptians and Jordanians and Syrians and Saudi are all more along the lines of “Kill all of the Jews!”

I wouldn’t consider the expulsion of upwards to seven hundred thousand people from their homes a minor thing, nor would I consider such land “sparsely populated”. Not unless we’d agree that clearly out every man woman and child in the state of North Dakota wouldn’t be no thang…

From that Wiki Place

mr-cappadocia:

If there is a fundamental error I’m making in the following from a lack of information feel free to let me know. The issue in question isn’t one I am overly familiar with and thus my opinions are suspect. 

After WWII there were hundreds of thousands of displaced Jews and despite the terrible ordeal they had endured as a people anti-antisemitism still existed the world over. 

So there were perhaps millions of refugees and a world where they had no place to go and quite often couldn’t go home.

The Allied command made the decision to afford the Jewish people the independent nation of Israel partially to provide a safe homeland for the Jewish people but mostly so they wouldn’t have millions of Jews within their borders.

And this sat well with everyone except for the people that were promptly displaced by the “invading” Jews.

This seems a little bizarre but think of it this way. Imagine a group of people wildly and distinctly different from yours… culturally, religiously, linguistically… and they all show up in your city en masse.

And then you find out it’s because some foreign government put them there and they didn’t exactly consult you and yours before doing so.

So now we have a nation of Jews that have no other place to go and a nation of Palestinians that consider the land their own.

Except now the Jewish people have also begun to recognize the land as their own (which also has basis in fact).

So you have a group of people scarred by the events of the holocaust, and a group of people scarred by cultural displacement.

In other words both have what could be considered a justifiable argument for their side. That’s what makes the whole thing shitty.

Then comes the argument that the Palestinians engage in terrorist acts. Which is true. They do. On a fundamental level so did American colonists to push out the British. So does virtually every people that have ever been displaced.

Then comes the argument that the Israelis are using their military to oppress and drive out and beat down the Palestinian people. That’s because they often are. But the hell are they supposed to do? Their people are being shelled, attacked by fucking rocket launchers, and dying all too frequently.

This is one of those supremely shitty situations where *everyone* involved has a right to be pissed off and no solutions are easy and there will be no winners.

Decades of attempted diplomatic solutions have proven that diplomacy cannot work and so the only solution left is a violent one.

The Palestinians cannot drive the Israelis out. They haven’t the ability. Therefore the Israelis must decide to shit or get off the pot. Either they meet all of the Palestinians demands (which I doubt will ever be able to happen while a Jewish state yet exists) or you inform the Palestinians that there will be an absolute abolishing end to the Palestinian nation in all capacities.

Then they must proceed to burn Palestine to the ground and virtually salt the earth where it once was.

Whenever anyone tries to build you destroy the building and the person.

You refuse in absolute terms any entry of Palestinians into the Jewish state.

You execute any Palestinian adults who illegally enter. You imprison any children until adulthood and then deport them to the nearest border with guns pointed in their general direction.

Create a no-man’s land where none may live. Keep it that way for a generation and then move the Israeli people in.

You inform the Palestinian people of what you are doing beforehand to give them a chance to flee and then you move the fuck in without humanity, compassion, pity or remorse. Any Palestinians you find you deport at gunpoint. They walk, ride, or crawl directly to the border. Any that are unable receive assistance to the border. Any that are able and refuse get shot.

This is a shitty, unhappy, miserable fucking situation but try as I might I see no alternative than the above. I’d wish there were a Heaven just to hear me pray for an alternative. But try as I might I cannot see one.

The Palestinians have every right to demand their homeland and the Israelis have every right to keep the one they’ve got.

The only solution left on that table is whomever is strong enough to take it, completely, from the other and we already know the answer to that.

The 1948 Palestinian exodus, known in Arabic as theNakba(Arabic:النكبة‎,an-Nakbah, lit. “disaster”, “catastrophe”, or “cataclysm”),[1]occurred whenapproximately 711,000 to 726,000Palestinian Arabsfled or were expelled from their homes, during the1947–1948 Civil War in Mandatory Palestineand the1948 Arab–Israeli War.[2]The termnakbaalso refers to the period of war itself and events affecting Palestinians from December 1947 to January 1949, and is synonymous in that sense with what is known to Israelis as the War of Independence (Hebrew: מלחמת העצמאות or מלחמת הקוממיות, Milkhemet Ha’atzma’ut, a term which covers those two events).[3][4][5][6]

The exact number of refugees is a matter of dispute.[7]But around 80 percent of the Arab inhabitants of what became Israel (50 percent of the Arab total of Mandatory Palestine) left or were expelled from their homes.[8][9]The causes remain also the subject of fundamental disagreement between Arabs and Israelis. Factors involved in the exodus include Jewish military advances, attacks against Arab villages and fears of another massacre afterDeir Yassin,[10]:239–240which caused many to leave out of panic; expulsion orders by Zionist authorities; the voluntary self-removal of the wealthier classes,[11]the collapse in Palestinian leadership,[12]and an unwillingness to live under Jewish control.

So I mean hey… come on.

Yes.  Exactly.  The Six Day War, (represented in your post as the Nakba) was brought on by Egyptian and Syrian and Jordanian forces massing at Israel’s borders.  Israel had already faced these three countries in combat before and was simply not going to take them massing on the border without preempting the attack.  Israel stomped the military of the other three countries and then took land from all three countries as buffers to prevent further aggression from being right in close proximity to the main population centers of Israel.  They took land from Egypt, Syria, and Jordan, and ejected non-Israelite persons from those lands.   Now people who were Egyptian and Syrian and Jordanian are not identifying as Egyptian or Syrian or Jordanian but are claiming to be members of that nation of uber-victims, Palestine.  And more people are immigrating into Palestine from the surrounding Arab nations to make it seem as if Israel is attacking a major nation.

And they put their rocket launchers and military in schools and mosques and churches and apartment complexes specifically to increase the body count when the Israeli defend themselves.

This is despicable.

Training young teenagers to be suicide bombers is despicable.

Using babies and mothers as human shields is despicable.

This is why I support Israel.   

To recap, Israel was designated as a state by the UN shortly after WWII.  They were granted status as a sovereign nation and a small portion of land was set aside for them.  They lived on that land and improved it.

The “Arab Nations” tried to invade Israel.  Israel stopped them.  Barely.

Then the “Arab Nations” massed troops and equipment on the borders of Israel again.  

Israel stomped all over them and took their lunch along with large portions of the land claimed by those countries.  (part of the Palestinian Mandate, which was simply a land designation by the British Empire for that region)   The land you are arguing about was part of Egypt and part of Syria and part of Jordan. There was no country or state called Palestine when this happened.  Palestine was not recognized by the UN or any nation as a state until 1988.  

The people who were forced to relocate were not members of any Palestinian country or state.

They were citizens of Egypt or Jordan or Syria.  This happened because of a war.  The “Arab States” (Egypt, Jordan and Syria) started the first war.  Israel finished that one for them and then preempted their next attempt and finished that one for them as well.  

This was not some kind of human rights encroachment upon the poor innocent (nonexistent at the time) country of Palestine.  The people who are now calling themselves Palestinians were Jordanian or Egyptian or Syrian before the Six Day War.  After that they were refugees who decided they were part of a different country that didn’t actually exist at the time.  

You know more about it than I do.. I defer to your judgement.

Anonymous said: Would you date a black girl?

90s Hairstyles For Black Women

The fuck do you think?

What you SHOULD be asking is whether or not I FETISHIZE black women.

The answer to that is no. I don’t fetishize anyone.

Anonymous said: That thing about otherkin, is that specifically about the idiots who believe they are that particular animal, and use nounself pronouns, or does it also include people who feel they have a spiritual connection to that animal?

I also think spirituality is a sham, but I’m one of those asshole skeptics, so take from that what you will.

Anonymous said: How do you feel about women breast feeding in public?

I think all women should show their breasts in public… but that’s just me.

Anonymous said: What do you think of the Gaza crisis? Is either side justified?

iamsineater:

To be fair, Palestine was not a nation prior to 1988.

Palestine was a regional name for a stretch of land occupied by various tribes of Arabs and Jews. It was historically sparsely settled until WWII, when Jews flocked there under UN agreement and formed the UN recognized state of Israel.  

http://www.cjpmo.org/DisplayDocument.aspx?DocumentID=18

This document is actually anti-Semitic in nature, but it does break down the sparsity of the population in Palestine prior to WWII.

In the US small cities have more population than the entire region of Palestine had.  And entire sections of those small cities are overrun by illegal immigrants.  And we don’t lob rockets indiscriminately at Mexico and Guatemala and Cuba.  

And Israel started out as a much smaller state.  But actions by Jordan and Syria and Egypt that caused the Six Day War caused Israel to move to expand her borders because of the need for a buffer zone between the country borders and the existing cities and larger population areas in Israel.  

The problem is not simply Israel versus Palestine.  The problem in reality is Israel versus the entire Arab region.  There are “residents” of Palestine that were residents of Egypt or Saudi Arabia or Jordan or Syria a month or two ago and are now considered to be some kind of victim of Israeli oppression.  There has been and continues to be a massive influx of non-Palestinian natives into Palestine because of anti-Semitism and because of Shari’a law that states that death in battle with non-believers is awarded with everlasting paradise.  The rockets and other materials are brought in from underground tunnels by Egyptian and Syrian and Jordanian smugglers.  

I think from an ethical viewpoint the Israeli are more live and let live where the Palestinians and Egyptians and Jordanians and Syrians and Saudi are all more along the lines of “Kill all of the Jews!”

I wouldn’t consider the expulsion of upwards to seven hundred thousand people from their homes a minor thing, nor would I consider such land “sparsely populated”. Not unless we’d agree that clearly out every man woman and child in the state of North Dakota wouldn’t be no thang…

From that Wiki Place

mr-cappadocia:

If there is a fundamental error I’m making in the following from a lack of information feel free to let me know. The issue in question isn’t one I am overly familiar with and thus my opinions are suspect. 

After WWII there were hundreds of thousands of displaced Jews and despite the terrible ordeal they had endured as a people anti-antisemitism still existed the world over. 

So there were perhaps millions of refugees and a world where they had no place to go and quite often couldn’t go home.

The Allied command made the decision to afford the Jewish people the independent nation of Israel partially to provide a safe homeland for the Jewish people but mostly so they wouldn’t have millions of Jews within their borders.

And this sat well with everyone except for the people that were promptly displaced by the “invading” Jews.

This seems a little bizarre but think of it this way. Imagine a group of people wildly and distinctly different from yours… culturally, religiously, linguistically… and they all show up in your city en masse.

And then you find out it’s because some foreign government put them there and they didn’t exactly consult you and yours before doing so.

So now we have a nation of Jews that have no other place to go and a nation of Palestinians that consider the land their own.

Except now the Jewish people have also begun to recognize the land as their own (which also has basis in fact).

So you have a group of people scarred by the events of the holocaust, and a group of people scarred by cultural displacement.

In other words both have what could be considered a justifiable argument for their side. That’s what makes the whole thing shitty.

Then comes the argument that the Palestinians engage in terrorist acts. Which is true. They do. On a fundamental level so did American colonists to push out the British. So does virtually every people that have ever been displaced.

Then comes the argument that the Israelis are using their military to oppress and drive out and beat down the Palestinian people. That’s because they often are. But the hell are they supposed to do? Their people are being shelled, attacked by fucking rocket launchers, and dying all too frequently.

This is one of those supremely shitty situations where *everyone* involved has a right to be pissed off and no solutions are easy and there will be no winners.

Decades of attempted diplomatic solutions have proven that diplomacy cannot work and so the only solution left is a violent one.

The Palestinians cannot drive the Israelis out. They haven’t the ability. Therefore the Israelis must decide to shit or get off the pot. Either they meet all of the Palestinians demands (which I doubt will ever be able to happen while a Jewish state yet exists) or you inform the Palestinians that there will be an absolute abolishing end to the Palestinian nation in all capacities.

Then they must proceed to burn Palestine to the ground and virtually salt the earth where it once was.

Whenever anyone tries to build you destroy the building and the person.

You refuse in absolute terms any entry of Palestinians into the Jewish state.

You execute any Palestinian adults who illegally enter. You imprison any children until adulthood and then deport them to the nearest border with guns pointed in their general direction.

Create a no-man’s land where none may live. Keep it that way for a generation and then move the Israeli people in.

You inform the Palestinian people of what you are doing beforehand to give them a chance to flee and then you move the fuck in without humanity, compassion, pity or remorse. Any Palestinians you find you deport at gunpoint. They walk, ride, or crawl directly to the border. Any that are unable receive assistance to the border. Any that are able and refuse get shot.

This is a shitty, unhappy, miserable fucking situation but try as I might I see no alternative than the above. I’d wish there were a Heaven just to hear me pray for an alternative. But try as I might I cannot see one.

The Palestinians have every right to demand their homeland and the Israelis have every right to keep the one they’ve got.

The only solution left on that table is whomever is strong enough to take it, completely, from the other and we already know the answer to that.

The 1948 Palestinian exodus, known in Arabic as theNakba(Arabic:النكبة‎,an-Nakbah, lit. “disaster”, “catastrophe”, or “cataclysm”),[1]occurred whenapproximately 711,000 to 726,000Palestinian Arabsfled or were expelled from their homes, during the1947–1948 Civil War in Mandatory Palestineand the1948 Arab–Israeli War.[2]The termnakbaalso refers to the period of war itself and events affecting Palestinians from December 1947 to January 1949, and is synonymous in that sense with what is known to Israelis as the War of Independence (Hebrew: מלחמת העצמאות or מלחמת הקוממיות, Milkhemet Ha’atzma’ut, a term which covers those two events).[3][4][5][6]

The exact number of refugees is a matter of dispute.[7]But around 80 percent of the Arab inhabitants of what became Israel (50 percent of the Arab total of Mandatory Palestine) left or were expelled from their homes.[8][9]The causes remain also the subject of fundamental disagreement between Arabs and Israelis. Factors involved in the exodus include Jewish military advances, attacks against Arab villages and fears of another massacre afterDeir Yassin,[10]:239–240which caused many to leave out of panic; expulsion orders by Zionist authorities; the voluntary self-removal of the wealthier classes,[11]the collapse in Palestinian leadership,[12]and an unwillingness to live under Jewish control.

So I mean hey… come on.

Anonymous said: What do you think of otherkin?

I think they’re a group of people that have a collective fantasy they all indulge one another in.

I can understand identifying with animals, concepts, even ideologies. That does not mean one *is* one of those things. It simply means that you have, in a way, engaged in reverse anthropomorphism. You have taken human context and shaped it to fit an inhuman thing rather than take an inhuman thing and force it into a human context.

It’s children playing make-believe.

dontkillseanbean:

Brace yourselves, Legends is coming. And so our death watch begins… 


am I the only one that sees it?

dontkillseanbean:

Brace yourselves, Legends is coming. And so our death watch begins… 

am I the only one that sees it?

Anonymous said: How do you feel about cities competing with telecom companies by providing public broadband?

Telecommunications companies have artificial monopolies. Where such monopolies exist I firmly support the government stepping in (PARTICULARLY LOCAL GOVERNMENT) and creating competition.

As a business person my dream is to hold a monopoly over a particular market selling a particular product.

As a citizen I know monopolies are dangerous as fuck and should be shot down whenever possible.

The *only* organization that should have any form of monopoly is a governmental organization because governments are held to measure by the people.

If Weehauken Public Internet is doing a shit job then the people of Weehauken can step in and fire all those motherfuckers someway somehow.

They can’t do that with Comcast.

WHO I FUCKING HATE. My business had comcast. I won’t even detail the nightmare ordeal and fucking money they cost me (and they cost me *a lot* of money). I’ve been relatively silent on this issue because of my undying hatred of comcast makes me biased. If they straight fucking burned to the ground I’d have a hard time shedding any tears.

My company uses fucking DEE ESS ELL because I hate comcast so much and they’re the only other option. Staff knows not to question me on this issue.

What was I talking about again?

Anonymous said: aye, my boy cap getting brolic. So cap where do we find this diet you're on? Was off tumblr for a couple of days. :P

Summer sausage, cheese, phentermine, nuts, applejuice, diethylpropion, jerky, and the occassional bunless cheeseburger (Which McDs doesn’t give you any shit about at all, they put it in a container and everything).

And TRICYCLE RIDING!!!